-Manu K
|
The eco tourists at a beech, a nesting grounds of the Green Sea Turtle during the annual aribada or the 'Return for egg-laying' season |
Eco-tourism can be just as
damaging as honest hedonistic holiday-making.
-Anita Pleumarom
Eco-tourism, in the nineties was perceived as a harmless eco
friendly activity and was provided with huge subsidies to develop it into an
industry. It is still presented as sustainable, nature-based and
environmentally friendly activity. In these days however it is a subject of
considerable controversy. With lack of proper guidelines for tour operators and
absence of any monitoring mechanisms in countries like India the
business is sprawling.
|
A Selfie enthusiast walking right upon arriving Sea Turtles. |
‘Eco-tourism’ is the tourism industry's fastest growing
subsector; with an estimated world-wide annual growth of 16%. Governments as
well as the corporations promote eco-tourism, with claims of environment upkeep
and economic benefits to the local communities. It was campaigned that if the livelihood of
the local communities are elevated they take custody of the forests or the
species in it. But there are well-founded concerns that it lacks adequate
scientific foundations, and is not viable as a solution to the world's social
and environmental problems. One of the classical examples is that of the world
famous Bharathpur Bird Sanctuary. In the eighties and nineties the birds as
well as the industry thrived. Every house around the lake –sanctuary flourished
as a Home stay facility. Like the name of the guest house the dishes and ice
creams on the menu card were after one or the other bird. A crane’s cottage had
rooms called barbet, bulbul and a sparrow while the menu card listed sandpipers
delight or a shoveller’s scoop for deserts. Every rickshaw puller was a ‘bird
specialist’ and could name a hundred birds.
|
The mad rush and the unruly behavior of the tourists made many turtles return back without laying, for which the Costa-Rican Government has ordered and enquiry. |
But 2004 was a fateful year for Bharatpur; there was a periodic
drought like in 1972 and 1979. As a mitigating measure the state government of
Rajasthan prioritized the demand of farmers over the birds. The Central Government tried to intercede, but
the then Chief Minister Ms. Vasundhara Raje refused to relent. As though to
appease farmers belonging to a particular community, she issued an order to divert
water from the Ajan Bund away from the Bharatpur marshes and into the sugarcane
fields surrounding the park. It unleashed a catastrophic consequence for this 250
year-old, man-made wetland. Both animals and birds died. In the whole episode
the eco tourism operators never raised a voice. Even before the industry
collapsed they had bolted towards Agra and Mathura.
Eco-tourism is an eco-facade
Many eco-tourism claims concerning its benefits are
exaggerated, or owe more to labeling and marketing than genuine sustainability.
Not only are such projects repeatedly planned and carried out without local
consent and support, but they often threaten local cultures, economies, and
natural resource bases. Critics regard eco-tourism as an `eco-facade': a tactic
concealing the mainstream tourism industry's consumptive and exploitative
practices by simply calling it ‘green’.
|
Where is the privacy for Tigers or its prey? Modern communication gadgets help tour operators identify and communicate among themselves to assemble such crowds to witness Large cats. |
Of particular concern is the side stepping of crucial
questions in the promotion of eco-tourism, regarding the global economy and
widening gap between rich and poor, particularly in Third
World countries. Significant social and political issues such as the
uneven distribution of resources, inequalities in political representation and
power, and the growth of unsustainable consumption patterns are marginalized or
ignored.
A typical example could be found in the islands of Andaman
and Nicobar Islands. Most of the investors on
the islands are non residents from the distant states of West
Bengal and Tamilnadu and simply out match the scale of operation
of the local community deceiving the consideration of the carrying capacity of
the site. While a middle man luring us to go to his destination for a stint of
scuba diving, was out rightly mentioning the low costs of the other because it
is operation since twenty years and his was a recent opening. He clearly
explained how disturbed waters would be devoid of coral life. When questioned
about hoe just was it to open up more and more beaches for such activities he
admitted that he had no option for survival!
|
Responsible Safari Operators not common men......... |
Environmentally risky
Eco-tourism may sound benign, but one of its most serious
impacts is the expropriation of virgin' territories - national parks, wildlife
parks and other wilderness areas - which are packaged for eco-tourists as the
green option. Eco-tourism is highly consumer-centered, catering mostly to affluent
urbanized societies. In order to rope in the new middle-class `alternate lifestyle'
seekers low end eco tourisms are thought off. However, most destinations are
advertised as heaven on Earth, `untouched' places, `off the beaten track' and
once in a life time experience.
Operators are always looking for newer destinations and try to
provide the best of urban comforts to their clients. As the Industry grows big
it ties up with all other lobbies to harvest profits and wouldn’t bother to
remember their moral code. Now it is the
turn of Kudremukh Wildlife Sanctuary which recently lost its berth as a Tiger reserve.
The pristine landscape of these shoal forests were plagued by the unfortunate
consequences of mining industry for thirty years between the seventies and the
late nineties. Initiatives of the concerned citizens brought in a Supreme Court
order of closure of all mining operations in the area since 2000. The
Kudhremukh Iron Ore Company limited (KIOCL), however dragged the case and held
on till 2005 asking for pull back time and claiming its responsibility of
fixing the topsoil in the mined area. It is said that the company changed its
bye-laws and had applied for permits to undertake tourism operations in the
left behind infrastructure. Today it is read that the company has transferred
some its residential complexes to Alva’s Kudremukh Nisargadhama which intends
to construct luxury health resorts to undertake eco-tourism. The forest
department has served notices on both the companies as it is a violation of the
Eco sensitive zone and the Kudhremukh
National park also of the
Supreme Court and the Wilderness Tourism Policy (WTP) 2004. However the
cultural bastions of Dakshina Kannada are grieving that the building are too
worn-out and full of weeds and no tourist can come in the immediate future.
While they say their only intention is to enhance the forest cover, they are
forced to carryout some basic repair works of the buildings. Only time can tell
how they justify their stands about violations and good intentions and concern
of Nature and Wildlife.
|
An un attended School crowd left aloof by the school teachers or a Nature Camp organisers amidst WIld boar. |
Mega-resorts, including luxury hotels, condominiums,
shopping centers and golf course, are increasingly established in nature
reserves in the name of eco-tourism - in many cases protested as
`eco-terrorism'. What begins as Nature
friendly gradually turns out people friendly, deceiving the natural local elements
of every order. Flourishing eco tourism projects in many places across the
globe are with completely artificial landscapes and exotic plants, tending to
irretrievably wipe out native plant and wildlife species – some times the
entire eco-systems.
No local benefits
Diverse local social and economic activities are replaced by
an eco-tourism monoculture. Contrary to claims, local people do not necessarily
benefit from eco-tourism. Tourism-related employment is greatly overrated:
locals are usually left with low-paying service jobs such as tour guides,
porters, and food and souvenir vendors. In addition, they are not assured of
year-round employment: workers may be laid off during the off-season. Most
money, as with conventional tourism, is made by foreign airlines, tourism
operators, and developers who repatriate profit to their own economically more
advanced countries.
|
Eco tourism in the Andamans; People thronging for a boat ride at Radhanagar Beach. |
Eco-tourism's claim that it preserves and enhances local
cultures but it is highly insincere. Ethnic groups are viewed as a major asset
in attracting visitors; an `exotic' backdrop to natural scenery and wildlife.
The simultaneous romanticism and devastation of indigenous cultures is one of
eco- tourism's ironies.
|
Just beyond the tree line of islands is the garbage dump, well below the high-tide mark at the famous Elephant Island in the Andamans. |
Given a lack of success stories, and sufficient evidence of
serious adverse effects, the current huge investments in eco-tourism are
misplaced and irresponsible. Research, education, and information for tourists are
an absolute need of the hour. Unfortunately there is no third party doing such
work. Every government has stood up to
pump in money into the industry, provide a red carpet to foreign investors, and
loosen the laws of the land and provide huge subsidies for ventures. Countering
of eco-tourism's demeaning of local cultures and the local ecosystems and
unjust sharing of profits must become something of a serious matter of the
Governments. To accomplish this target, there has to be a civic engagement not
as an option but as the central element of the charter.