My earliest memory of going for a
safari ride in Bandipur dates back to the days when it was just declared a
Tiger reserve, after the initiation of the Project tiger in the country. Those
were the days when safaris were conducted in an open lorry. People were all
filled upon the back and there was little arrangement for sitting. Anyway most
people preferred to stand as the roads were rough and there was nobody to establish
order among the crowd. A lame guard with a double barrel gun in his khakhis
on board was the guide. There must have also
been some sort of mini buses commuting in the forests, for a different category
of people.
Then came the days of H C
Basappanavar, the first project director in Karnataka. He brought visible
changes in the attitude of the public. Education camps for teachers and
students began in war footing and a different class of people started emerging
among the public. Ever since, people who cared to list their sightings on a
safaris had wild boar (Sus scrofa) as a serious entry. One saw them so
scarcely. As days passed, they became common and were soon not a subject with
special emphasis. As though an index of
success of project Tiger, certain species started thriving all over the
country. Among half a dozen such species the Indian Wild pig seems to top the
list. A number of factors could have contributed for their success but one
cannot ignore the adaptability and resilience of these species.
In the post millennium times you
have started seeing Indian Wild pigs right in the reception area. They, along
with bonnet macaque are becoming commoner and commoner as though they are
greatest beneficiaries of tourism. It is just not the litter generated by the
passers by but people who stay over night are also too ‘spilly’ in their eating
habits. Without any centralized garbage disposing mechanism in the
establishment all organic wastes of both vegetable and animal origin in the
kitchen and the widely dispersed accommodations are scattered locally. In a matter
of seconds the scavengers clean it up making appear a very eco friendly way of
disposal. But what worries is who the scavenging animals are. Instead of
jackals, crows or vultures that traditionally cleaned up the left overs but now
animals like the wild pigs and the bonnet macaques have moved in. They both eat
up anything disposed by humans and are now competing with one another. In order
to have the best access to the human generated food they have learned to guard
their territories and be very patient with the humans.
A wild pig bolting with the remains of a chittal deer |
Today they are seen holding their
resting places very close to one or the other guest house. They appear to be
very docile and domesticated and get to the door step of the visitors. But once
they feel threatened or challenged they immediately plunge-back their own
evolutionary past and become wild. There are many stray instances of humans,
being hurt by the pigs and monkeys as well.
Off late the wild pigs are
getting into focus in the reception area. The nice green lawn spread across the
residential area and the kitchen has been the roost for at least a thousand
spotted deer every night. This habit of the deer seeking shelter amidst human
settlement is an age old phenomenon. The ungulates seem at home in human
vicinity and carry out all their natural chores like mating to breeding in this
area. No doubt the predatory tigers and leopards also have this turf as their
home range.
When you went out for a nature
walk in the early mornings a few years ago you would find traces of deer
predation in the fringes of the open area. A leopard or a tiger would have made
a kill and left the half eaten remains of its quarry and gone because of day
break.
Two years ago, one early morning
while I was with a group of students a female pig and her five juvenile
offspring dashed out of a bush with a full rib cage of a chital deer. It was
just astonishing to me even though I had read about the scavenging nature of
the Wild pigs and how they could be a serious threat for an inexperienced
predator. In about five minutes the family decimated the entire carcass.
Today you don’t see any trace of
a kill in this area. Probably the wild pigs may be even snatching the kill off
from their predators in case he is young or inexperienced.
Last fortnight it was a sunny
afternoon and even as the tourists started gathering for the safari, we were
sitting under a Pongamia tree for a group discussion. As usual the bonnet
macaques perambulated among various groups and were dis-heartedly settling around
us as none of us had anything of their curiosity. All of a sudden there was an
alarm call from a bonnet macaque as though there was some large sized predator.
All we could see was a khakhi rag being pulled about by three pigs. It
was a young female and her two juvenile companions man-handling a juvenile
bonnet macaque. The larger of the pigs was holding the macaque by one of its
legs and the other two fought to get hold of any spare of the macaque. It was a strange team-up of the pigs yet they
worked in stealth. After an initial
burst towards the predators, all the macaques bolted to safety and even started
urinating and defecating where ever they were. The opportunistic predators
simply bolted to cover with its half dead quarry in its mouth. Half an hour later they were seen back
sniffing around without a trace of blood on their face as I had just finished
explaining the children how eating and being eaten is part of nature.
What makes the wild pigs
change their behaviour?
Scientists propose several hypotheses, which need to be
tested in the future, to explain the observed unusual behaviour of the boar. Shreejata Gupta and Anindya Sinha of the Indian Institute of advanced studies who have
made similar observations explain the phenomenon as follows.
The opportunistic predator
hypothesis: It suggests that the prey individual was foraging away from the
other troop members and thus, perhaps, increased its chances of being attacked
opportunistically by the predatory boar. Although opportunistic predators are
not believed this possibility cannot be easily ruled out in this particular
situation.
The habitat complexity
hypothesis: This argues that a greater structural complexity of the habitat
would promote relatively less visibility of a prey species to its predator and
vice versa. The Reception area of the Park, where the hunting occurred, is
characterized by open, well-maintained grassland with sparsely spaced tall
trees. The natural habitat of wild boars in Bandipur, in contrast, is typically
forested with fairly dense undergrowth and the contrasting open Reception area
may thus have provided better visibility to the boar and induced an incipient
predator-like behaviour to express itself.
The catch |
The intra-guild predation
hypothesis: A guild is defined as ‘a group of species that exploit the same
class of environmental resources in similar way’. Intra-guild Predation refers
to situations where two species, competing for shared resources, predate on one
another. In this particular case, one of the major food sources for both the
bonnet macaques and the wild boars in the Reception area of the Park is
provisioning of human origin food by the visiting tourists. Such an
anthropogenic foraging option could have potentially turned the two otherwise non-competing
species into competitors. As a result, a novel case of asymmetric intra-guild
predation could have emerged in this situation.
Such observations raise several
crucial issues pertaining to the behaviour ecology of species that commonly
occur in anthropogenic landscapes. There has hardly been, for example, any
systematic study on the behaviour of wild boars, which has the potential to
uncover flexibility in behavioral traits such as the reported switch from a
more species typical foraging strategy (carrion-feeding) to a more adaptive one
(opportunistic predation). Moreover, the
possibility of a wild boar predating on a non-traditional prey species such as
a bonnet macaque as a result of competition over human provided food resources,
if tenable, has significant implications for their conservation in increasingly
prevalent atypical ecological regimes.
nice simple narration. thanks also for categorizing the hypothesis
ReplyDelete